1. Tenants in Common

Taking title to real estate as tenants in common is sometimes a deliberate choice or can be the default when no other method is specified. In a tenancy in common, two or more people can share ownership rights to real property with each owner having a right to use and possess the entire parcel, regardless of the fractional share each owner paid. So, for example, if A pays $40K and B pays $60K for the property, this does not mean that B gets to divide the property up consistent with his 60% share and exclude A from it. Rather, both A and B must share the entire property.
The 50/50 rule applies to most aspects of a tenancy in common. For example, owners are equally responsible for maintenance costs and taxes. Only one property tax bill will be issued for the parcel, thus it is the responsibility of the parties to divide costs up as they see fit. The most efficient way to do this is through a tenancy in common agreement. Further, each owner is said to own his or her interest “severally”, meaning that he or she is free to sell or dispose of his or her interest, and no consent of the other co-owner is necessary to do so. It is easy to see some of the pros and cons of a tenancy in common, compiled below:

Pros of a tenancy in common:

• Allows individuals to pool their resources so that they can afford property,

• Each party can own different sections of the property if specified by a tenancy in common agreement, and

• Property taxes and other expenses are split between all owners

Cons of a tenancy in common:

• There are no survivorship rights in a tenancy in common, which means that when one owner dies, his/her share does not pass to the other owner, but rather to the decedent’s estate,

• Each owner must share the entire parcel with the other owner, unless the parties agree otherwise, and

• Owners may end up with unanticipated co-owners as a result of each owner’s right to freely transfer or sell their interest or when one owner passes away.

2. Joint tenancy

A joint tenancy, like a tenancy in common, allows two or more people or entities to share a property equally. However, unlike a tenancy in common, joint tenants have survivorship rights, meaning that if one owner dies, his or her share passes to the remaining owner or owners.
Joint tenants, like tenants in common, must share the entire parcel with the other owners. There is still the option of drafting a joint tenancy agreement to fractionally divide each owner’s share. However, there are some unexpected nuances here. For example, if joint tenants agreed to fractionally divide the parcel and one joint tenant decides to lease his or her share, most would presume that the owner offering the lease gets to keep all proceeds from the lease. However, this is incorrect – the typical presumption is that the lease proceeds must be split 50/50 or equally with the other owners.

Pros of a joint tenancy:

• Survivorship rights when one owner dies; his or her interest passes to the remaining owner(s), thus affording the opportunity to become a sole owner,

• Each owner can own specified sections of the property if specified by a joint tenancy agreement, and

• Property taxes and other expenses are split between all owners

Cons of a joint tenancy:

• Each owner must share the parcel with the other owners, unless the parties agree otherwise, and

• Equal rights and responsibilities of all owners mean that if one owner takes a loan out against the property, all co-owners may responsible.

3. Marital property

Wisconsin, being a marital property state views all property as owned by the marriage, not each individual in it. Thus, each spouse automatically owns a ½ share of all property acquired in the marriage, unless a marital property agreement specifies otherwise. For Wisconsin transplants who have acquired property out-of-state before moving to Wisconsin, property is recognized as quasi-community property, which is complex and helps courts determine how to divide property upon divorce or death.
Marital property, like property taken in joint tenancy, has survivorship rights. In the marital context, this means that if one spouses dies, the surviving spouse receives the deceased spouse’s half of the property. A common example is a home held in title as marital property. If both spouses are on the deed to the home, then the entire home goes to the surviving spouse. Depending on each couple’s situation, this may be either a pro or a con. Some of these pros and cons are outlined below:

Pros of marital property:

• Survivorship rights: If one spouse dies, his or her share goes to the surviving spouse

Cons of marital property:

• Frustrated interests: If one spouse wants to sell, but the other does not, it can cause a gridlock on being able to sell the property. Both spouses need to agree to sell.

• Even if one spouse was the one to acquire the property at first, the other spouse may acquire a ½ share if the property is used as a primary residence or marital funds are used to pay or upkeep the property. This can be a con in the context of divorce or estate planning.

Summary:

Now that you understand the three ways co-owners can take title to property and the cons that may arise when co-owners interest become frustrated, you may be wondering what solutions are available when co-owners cannot come to an agreement.

One option is asking the court to petition the property, which will be discussed in our upcoming blog post. Stay tuned and read on!

The post Ways to take Title to Real Estate appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

Wills

If you have a will that was drafted in a different state before moving to Wisconsin, it will still be valid so long as it satisfies Wisconsin’s requirements of a valid will. These requirements include having the will in writing and having at least two disinterested witnesses at the time of signing.

In Wisconsin, your will may be changed through a codicil, which allows an individual to make amendments or changes at any time during their life. Some reasons that you may need a codicil to your will after moving to Wisconsin include, but are not limited to, changes to property, location of assets, location of beneficiaries, etc. For example, you may need to change the executor of your will if they live out of state. This is not only for practical reasons, in that the executor may have to handle matters in the decedent’s state, but also because Wisconsin law requires nonresidents to appoint an in-state resident to accept service of process and further, non-residency itself may be enough to disqualify an executor. See Wis Stat § 856.23.

Trusts

A living trust, also known as a revocable trust, is transferrable between states. However, it is important to speak with an attorney to update your trust to include any new assets and discuss whether moving your trust’s situs, aka its home, is advisable. On the other hand, an irrevocable trust’s situs may or may not be transferrable depending on the language of the trust. You should speak with an experienced estate planning attorney to understand the implications of having your trust’s situs in or out of state.

Similar to wills, it is advisable to have your trust’s situs as your state of residency. This is because unlike wills, which are attached to a person, trusts are entities governed by their respective state’s laws. Having a trust in a state other than your state of residency may require that your successor trustee hire an attorney in the state of the trust’s situs. Speaking with an attorney regarding your trust’s situs can help you understand other implications such as state fiduciary and inheritance taxes.

Transfer on Death Deed

A transfer on death deed allows property to be transferred to your beneficiaries without going through probate. If you have an existing transfer on death deed, it may need to be tweaked to reflect Wisconsin’s marital property laws. Moving to Wisconsin may make you to reconsider who is the beneficiary of your transfer on death deed. If it is the case that the beneficiary no longer seems appropriate, then you should speak with an attorney to revoke the deed and/or draft a new one.

Powers of Attorney

Your estate planning will typically include two kinds of powers of attorney (POA) – a financial power of attorney and a heath care power of attorney. The authority of someone granted to serve as a power of attorney is acknowledged in all states. However, moving is a perfect time to re-examine your agent selection. Wisconsin has adopted the Uniform Power of Attorney Act (UPOAA), along with 25 other states, which streamlines the laws governing POA’s. So, if your POA was created in a state that has not adopted the UPOAA, your POA could be challenged, and you should consult an attorney to clarify agent and grantor responsibilities.

Contact us today for a consultation at 262-725-0175 or our website’s contact page. Wynn at Law, LLC is based in Southern Wisconsin and has three office locations: Lake Geneva, Delavan, and Salem.

The post Do I need to update my estate planning after moving to Wisconsin? appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

Wisconsin Safe Deposit Will Retrieval

Photo by Arman Zhenikeyev, used with permission.

The post Remember the safe deposit box appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

The post Home builder contracts should reflect your interests appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

In one of our earlier articles, we talked about the Last Will and Testament — a crucial part of estate planning after someone passes. A Living Will is a legal document that sets out a person’s healthcare wishes in the event they cannot articulate the wishes. A Healthcare Power of Attorney (POA) is a separate alternative. The Living Will has your instructions — what you will and will not permit. The POA designates an ‘agent’ to make the decisions. Usually, the agent is a spouse, but can be a close friend. No matter who you choose, you have to let that agent know your wishes clearly.

The POA is even more powerful when it goes beyond healthcare decisions to include financial decisions as well. This Durable POA ensures the person making the healthcare calls has the money to pay for the procedures. The signer gets to choose how limited in scope the POA is: For example, it can be limited to using bank accounts only and not things like selling the house.

Where Wynn at Law, LLC adds value with such a POA is that the document and our Firm can be – if needed – the go-between if things get charged up among family members or family and caregivers. Things like resuscitation, painkillers, tube feeding, and organ donation can be powderkeg issues when they’re not backed up by a Living Will or a POA.

‘Why would you create a Durable POA over creating a Living Will?’ is a common question. The answer is simple: The POA agent can represent your thoughts on things for which you didn’t foresee in drafting a Living Will. You can’t plan for everything in writing in a Living Will, and the bills don’t stop just because a person is hospitalized. When you and your family come upon this intersection in life, these estate planning tools help keep the focus on the care you would have chosen and nobody has to guess.

*The content and material in this original post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.  

The post The power of advanced directives appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

The post Flood damage and selling a property appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

The post Medical bills a threat to financial independence appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

The post Avoid these five small-business-crushing scams appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

The post Form your company first appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.

The post Graduation, gifts, and financial aid appeared first on Wynn at Law, LLC.